(Udmurt)

SuffT & PerifT

SuffT: Tense is expressed through the use of a special suffix.

PerifT: Tense is expressed periphrastically.

(1)tonmyn-iśko-d
yougoPRS2SG
‘you go’ (Keľmakov – Hännikäinen 2008 : 28)

(2)somyn-e
(s)hego3SG
‘(s)he goes’ (Keľmakov – Hännikäinen 2008 : 28)

(3)tonvetl-o-d
youwalkFUT2SG
‘you will walk’ (Keľmakov – Hännikäinen 2008 : 141)

(4)tonkora-lo-d
youtree_cutFUT2SG
‘you will fell trees’ (Keľmakov – Hännikäinen 2008 : 141)

(5)tondyšetsk-i-d
youstudyPST2SG
‘you studied’ (Keľmakov – Hännikäinen 2008 : 179)

(6)tonkyrʒ́a-d
yousingPST.2SG
‘you sang’ (Keľmakov – Hännikäinen 2008 : 179)

(7)monmyn-iśkem
IgoPST2.1SG
tonmyn-em-ed
yougoPST22SG
somyn-em
(s)hegoPST2.3SG
mimyn-iśkem-my
wegoPST21PL
timyn-iľľam-dy
you (pl)goPST22PL
soosmyn-iľľam
theygoPST2.3PL (Keľmakov – Hännikäinen 2008: 199)

(8)somyn-i-zval
(s)hego-PST-3SGAUX.PST
‘(s)he left’ (Keľmakov – Hännikäinen 2008: 268)

(9)somyn-emval
(s)hegoPST2.1SGAUX.PST
‘(it seems that) (s)he left’ (Keľmakov – Hännikäinen 2008: 268)

(10)somyn-emvylem
(s)hegoPST2.1SGAUX.2PST
‘(it seems that) (s)he left’ (Keľmakov – Hännikäinen 2008: 268)

(11)ton,otćypyry-ku-m,šobret
youthereenterPTCP.SIM1SGblanket
ulynkyľľ-iśk-odńival.
underliePRS2SGPCLAUX.PST
‘When I went in there you were already lying under the blanket.’ (Matveyev 2005: 116)

(12)pićidyr-jamotćyvetly-nyjarat-iśk-oval.
littletimeILL.1SGtheregoINFlovePRS1SGAUX.PST
‘When I was little I used to love going there.’ (UdmCorp.)

(13)miľamtatynkolhoz-ynnokar-yl-oval
we.GENherekolkhozINEPCLdoFREQ3PLAUX.PST
no markeaľianalt-i-zy.
andwePCLnowneglectPST3PL
‘They used to do it here at the kolkhoz, but not any more.’ (Informant)

(14)bab-edvera-lo-zval.
grandma2SGsayFUT3SGAUX.PST
‘Your grandma would often say it.’ (Keľmakov 2006 : 211)

In Udmurt, present tense is expressed by the -(i)śko morpheme (1), which has a zero form in third person (2). Future tense is also expressed using synthetic means, by the -o/-lo suffix: verbs ending in -y take the suffix -o (3), and verbs ending in -a combine with the suffix -lo (4). To express past meanings both synthetic and analytic forms can be used: the first (witness) past tense is a synthetic tense using the suffix -i with verbs ending in -y (5), and formed without a suffix in case the verb ends in -a (6). The second (non-witness) past tense has its own synthetic paradigm with the suffix -(e)m appearing everywhere (7). Udmurt has several analytic past tenses combining a certain verb form and an auxiliary: the auxiliary val is used for witness past (8)–(9), (11)–(14), whereas the auxiliary for non-witness past meanings is vylem (10). The different periphrastic past tense forms express other functions as well: first (8) and second past perfect (9)–(10) represent distant past (Keľmakov – Hännikäinen 2008 : 268); combining a present verb form and an auxiliary can express progressivity (11) and imperfectivity for a certain period of time (12), as well as pluractional habituality (13) (in the latter case the frequentative suffix -ly/-ľľa can also appear on the verbal root); the relatively rare combination of a future verb form and an auxiliary results in habitual readings (14); (Horváth 2015, 2018 : 93–94, 98, Perevoshchikov et al. 1962: 208).

Author: Laura Horváth


[🠐 back]